Juniper extending its Virtualization portfolio

SUNNYVALE, Calif., Dec. 6, 2010 — Juniper Networks (NYSE: JNPR) today announced it has acquired Altor Networks, a leading provider of virtualization security technology that enables organizations to secure the virtualized world. This acquisition will allow Juniper to extend its market-leading security position by delivering an integrated, highly-scalable security architecture that protects physical and virtual systems. Under the terms of the agreement, Juniper acquired Altor for a cash purchase price of approximately $95 million, net of Altor shares already owned by Juniper.

For more details please click here

Gartner UTM Results for 2010

Gartner Magic quadrant for UTM is just released. Fortinet rocks again. Cisco and juniper are are utilizing 3rd party UTM component. Juniper has teamed up with Kaspersky and Sophos while Cisco partnered with trend micro to offer the same. Fortinet clearly has an edge of developing integrated technologies. SonicWALL along with checkpoints solutions do also look impressive

The full report is available at

CLICK ME

Do Write Memory and DHCP !!! Not always Best Bet

Lets go to IOS and experience an interesting case

R1(config)#ip dhcp pool Strange

Oh wait a min, I want to save my Config !!! Lets use write mem or do wr

R1(dhcp-config)#do wr
R1(dhcp-config)#end

Now My Config is save, let see show run output

Sh run
Output ommited....
!
ip dhcp pool Strange
domain-name wr------------> Ooops watch that.....where the domain name comes!!!!
!

My God this made me totally mad during an implementation, i were able to figure out this after sometime. So beware of shorcuts they are not always good (:

IOS privilege and Show Running Dispute:

One of my client has requested to implement role based access using IOS privilege level and AAA local Database. I encounter an interesting problem. The customer requested to make a user with only show running-configuration access



When this particular user is created with a privilege level 10, and only show running-config is assigned to that privelege but to my surprise it only shows blank configuration Initially it was considered to be cisco Bug. When i dig it further, it found out that it is Cisco design and not any bug.

Please refer below for details
IOS Privilege Levels Cannot See Complete Running Configuration

Cisco IOS comes with 16 privialege level from 0-15 By default, Cisco assigns commands to only three of these privilege levels: zero, user, and enable. There are five commands with privilege level zero: disable, enable, exit, help, and logout. User EXEC mode — privilege level 1 (when you login this is default level). Privileged EXEC mode — privilege level 15 (when you are in enable mode, equivalent to root access of linux)

To assign a privilege level to a user:
2801(config)# username support password abc privilege 5
2801# show privilege
Current privilege level is 5

To assign a privilege level to a particular command
Router1#configure terminal
Router1(config)#privilege exec level 1 show running-config


Problem Finding:
The show running configuration only displays all of the commands that the current user is able to modify. i.e. in other words, only shows configuration section that is below the user's current privilege level.

Solution:
1- Instead of using show run, we may use show startup but it may show steal configuration and might not be actual replica of running configuration.
2- We may use command

username printconfig privilege 10 password test

username printconfig privilege 15 autocommand show running

By doing when the user is login the show running config command will be executed immediately but immediately logut the user. SO we will leave with configuration but need some other account to perform troubleshooting etc.



Reference:
How to Configure Local Username Database in Cisco IOS
http://www.petri.co.il/csc_how_to_configure_local_username_database_cisco_ios.htm

IOS Privilege Levels Cannot See Complete Running Configuration
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk59/technologies_tech_note09186a00800949d5.shtml

IPSEC not supported!!!! Reason you go for router

One of the many things that my customer ask why we donot go for layer 3 switch instead of router when ethernet is our only requirement. Cisco 1 port FE card still have GPL of 950 USD. While L3 switches comes with 24/48 port and this is really cheaper when customer require many Ethernet interfaces.

Well although in some cases the customer may opt the option but i still don't encourage them as one obvious answer is router is still intended for routing while L3 switch is still have switching hardware and intended for LAN . It cannot support many necessary features like IPSEC VPN, GRE tunnel and even NAT that are necessary for WAN edge

Well i still remember from my previous job experience that one of my colleague purchase 3560 for site to site vpn with router, only to figure out that IPsec is not supported on it.

To summarize L3 switches were introduced by keeping mind to perform efficient intervlan routing and are best within campus. Routers are destined for edge and will still be used at WAN edges.

Subinterface, SVI and Catalyst Catch!!!

Well there are many who do not know this

You cannot make subinterfaces on Cisco switches. No matter its 2960,3560 or 3750. No matter its LANLITE or LAN base. No matter its standard image or enhanced image. Subinterfaces are simply not supported.

So what the alternative solution? You get it. Use SVI instead. You can do almost every thing that you can do with physical interface

Int vlan 10
ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x
Access-group 101
IP ospf cost 10

SSL VPN Configuration...Good Resources!!!

On group study i found good links for SSL VPN config. I find it useful to document it for future reference!!!

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a008071c428.shtml

http://www.cisco.com/E-Learning/bulk/public/celc/Cisco_QLM13_ASA_beta/course_skin.html

http://www.tech21century.com/how-to-configure-anyconnect-ssl-vpn-on-cisco-asa-5500/